The h-index is a unique and useful tool for scientists to analyze the
impact of their academic work. It is an author-level metric that attempts to
measure both the productivity and the citation impact of the publications of a
scientist, a scholar, a researcher, or an organization.
The above index is based on the
set of the scientist's most cited papers and the number of citations that they
have received in other publications. Furthermore, the h-index can also be
applied for analyzing a scholarly journal as well as a group of scientists,
such as a department, a university, or even a whole country.
The letter h stems from its
founder. The index was suggested in 2005 by Jorge E. Hirsch, a physicist at
University of California San Diego (UCSD), and it also called the Hirsch index
or Hirsch number.
It reflects both the number of
publications and the number of citations per publication. The index is designed
to improve upon simpler measures such as the total number of citations or
publications.
However, the h-index works
properly only for comparing scientists working in the same field, and in
general it is affected by field-dependent factors. You can find an automated
h-index across different programs, such as Harzing's Publish or Perish program,
which calculates the h-index based on Google Scholar entries. Other databases
such as Scopus and the Web of Knowledge provide automated calculators too.
Meanwhile, Google have provided an automatically-calculated h-index within
their own Google Scholar profile.
To sum up, Hirsch suggested
that (for physicists) for faculty at major research universities, h of about 12
might be a typical value for advancement to tenure (associate professor) and
that h of about 18 might be a typical value for advancement to full professor.
In addition, 15 to 20 could mean a fellowship in the American Physical Society,
and 45 or higher could mean membership in the United States National Academy of
Sciences.
Reference:
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research
output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America. 2005;102(46):16569-16572.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
0 comments:
Post a Comment